Talk:Magic: The Gathering/Statistics and trivia: Difference between revisions
>LegacymtgsalvationUser1033 |
>LegacymtgsalvationUser1033 No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"Only legal card allowing for the breach of rules: Relentless Rats" -- That's not true. There are many breaches of rules around ie. <c>Platinum Angel</c>, and to a lesser extent Kobolds that are red eventhough they cost {0}. As with relentless rats they "break the rules", but are upheld by the "Golden Rule" (e.g. Cards trump CompRules). Otherwise I love this page. :-) --[[User:GWiZ665|GWiZ665]] 19:11, 15 April 2007 (CDT) | "Only legal card allowing for the breach of rules: Relentless Rats" -- That's not true. There are many breaches of rules around ie. <c>Platinum Angel</c>, and to a lesser extent Kobolds that are red eventhough they cost {0}. As with relentless rats they "break the rules", but are upheld by the "Golden Rule" (e.g. Cards trump CompRules). Otherwise I love this page. :-) --[[User:GWiZ665|GWiZ665]] 19:11, 15 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
: Oh... didn't know that. Guess it should be changed. I messed up the card totals a bit... I'll do an actual full count later... or something. --[[User:Xallium|Xallium]] 19:59, 15 April 2007 (CDT) | : Oh... didn't know that. Guess it should be changed. I messed up the card totals a bit... I'll do an actual full count later... or something. --[[User:Xallium|Xallium]] 19:59, 15 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
==Totals== | ==Totals== | ||
| Line 16: | Line 13: | ||
== Retrieved Date == | == Retrieved Date == | ||
[[User:Xallium|Xallium]] did you really retrieve your statistics on 15-02-2007? or did you mean 15-04-2007? --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 21:34, 15 April 2007 (CDT) | [[User:Xallium|Xallium]] did you really retrieve your statistics on 15-02-2007? or did you mean 15-04-2007? --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 21:34, 15 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:41, 16 April 2007
"Only legal card allowing for the breach of rules: Relentless Rats" -- That's not true. There are many breaches of rules around ie. Platinum Angel, and to a lesser extent Kobolds that are red eventhough they cost {0}. As with relentless rats they "break the rules", but are upheld by the "Golden Rule" (e.g. Cards trump CompRules). Otherwise I love this page. :-) --GWiZ665 19:11, 15 April 2007 (CDT)
- Oh... didn't know that. Guess it should be changed. I messed up the card totals a bit... I'll do an actual full count later... or something. --Xallium 19:59, 15 April 2007 (CDT)
Totals
Ok the totals I have are a little off as they exclude alternate editions/revisions, starter sets, and banned sets. I tried to have my search on MagicCards.info include the legal Starter Sets, but it yielded no results (must have been too many cards rendered or something). I think the totals should include Total Absolute Cards (including banned + unglued + revisions), Total Cards (including banned [not unglued]), and Total Legal Cards (just... legal cards). However, can anybody think of an easy way to find this without a 'brute force' attack?
Btw, the Flying figure is imperfect. My search includes everything that has the text 'Flying' in it and the only plausable way to find the exact number of actual flying creatures is just to sort through every page. So where the edit is, there is an unseen number which lists the last page checked (on the MagicCards.info page) to remove non-keyworded 'Flyers'. (yes, I know this sentence is really confusing). Would suck if flying wasn't the largest eh? --Xallium 20:58, 15 April 2007 (CDT)
- Flying has to be the biggest keyword hands down :) --GeoMike 21:04, 15 April 2007 (CDT)
If only...
If only the "Dumbest Card" would be encyclopediac. I would nominate Spinal Parasite. :P lol --Xallium 21:24, 15 April 2007 (CDT)
Retrieved Date
Xallium did you really retrieve your statistics on 15-02-2007? or did you mean 15-04-2007? --GeoMike 21:34, 15 April 2007 (CDT)