Talk:Functional reprint: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>LegacymtgsalvationUser8147 No edit summary |
>LegacymtgsalvationUser8147 No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=990811 Here's] an interesting link including functional reprints. --<span style="color:#FF0000">[[User:MORT|<sup><sup>M</sup></sup><sup>O</sup>R<sub>T</sub>]]</span> <sup><b>[[User talk: MORT|(T)]]</b></sup> 15:26, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | [http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=990811 Here's] an interesting link including functional reprints. --<span style="color:#FF0000">[[User:MORT|<sup><sup>M</sup></sup><sup>O</sup>R<sub>T</sub>]]</span> <sup><b>[[User talk: MORT|(T)]]</b></sup> 15:26, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
:"Functional reprint" is all dependant on the definition; speaking of which, we want to use a correct one, so, what is a correct definition, and is ours correct? <sup>M</sup><sub>M</sub> <sup>([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|talk!]])</sup> 15:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
==table== | |||
How about different way to sort them out? First column could be the original idea of the card, second - the latest functional reprint, and the notes would list f.reprints 'in between' (if any) and add any other info required. What do you think? --<span style="color:#FF0000">[[User:MORT|<sup><sup>M</sup></sup><sup>O</sup>R<sub>T</sub>]]</span> <sup><b>[[User talk: MORT|(T)]]</b></sup> 21:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:11, 6 July 2010
According to the reserve list, subtype is enough to differentiate between a funcitonal reprint and a new card.VestDan 21:44, 12 September 2006 (CDT)
Here's an interesting link including functional reprints. --MORT (T) 15:26, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- "Functional reprint" is all dependant on the definition; speaking of which, we want to use a correct one, so, what is a correct definition, and is ours correct? MM (talk!) 15:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
table
How about different way to sort them out? First column could be the original idea of the card, second - the latest functional reprint, and the notes would list f.reprints 'in between' (if any) and add any other info required. What do you think? --MORT (T) 21:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)