Template talk:Story sources/Misc: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Corveroth No edit summary |
>Corveroth No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I miss a bit the point of a portal with all red links. For the webcomics you could link to [[Path of the Planeswalker]] and [[Path of the Planeswalker II]]. --[[User:Hunterofsalvation|Hunter]] ([[User talk:Hunterofsalvation|talk]]) 05:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC) | I miss a bit the point of a portal with all red links. For the webcomics you could link to [[Path of the Planeswalker]] and [[Path of the Planeswalker II]]. --[[User:Hunterofsalvation|Hunter]] ([[User talk:Hunterofsalvation|talk]]) 05:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
: It's a work in progress. I've been working from a combination of [[list of storyline sources]] and external lists to try to collect ''everything'', some of which doesn't yet have an article. This section in particular has a number of publications that have no article, and are only referenced on the wiki via external links on the aforementioned list. Once I've got everything rounded up, and the missing articles written, I'll start distributing this navbox. --[[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) 05:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC) | : It's a work in progress. I've been working from a combination of [[list of storyline sources]] and external lists to try to collect ''everything'', some of which doesn't yet have an article. This section in particular has a number of publications that have no article, and are only referenced on the wiki via external links on the aforementioned list. Once I've got everything rounded up, and the missing articles written, I'll start distributing this navbox. And, yes, I'm aware of the Paths, and they can be included. However, if the individual stories are still online, I'd like to mention them all by name as well. --[[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) 05:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
:: Ambitious! Good work. --[[User:Hunterofsalvation|Hunter]] ([[User talk:Hunterofsalvation|talk]]) 05:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
::: The crazy ambitious thing to do would be to try to collect the entirety of the old Duelist articles, but I'll only be touching that in exceptional cases, since so much is prerevisionist. Speaking of which, do you know of any source for the origin of that term, or where that change was declared? --[[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) 05:53, 17 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Art books == | |||
I've got the art books listed in here, and I think that's correct for the modern ones, which incorporate story as well. While ''Convocations'' is entirely devoid of story, I think it's reasonable to include it alongside them because I frankly have no idea where it would ever be linked from otherwise. Do we ''have'' any sort of navigation for "other" publications? --[[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) 03:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:06, 15 February 2017
I miss a bit the point of a portal with all red links. For the webcomics you could link to Path of the Planeswalker and Path of the Planeswalker II. --Hunter (talk) 05:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- It's a work in progress. I've been working from a combination of list of storyline sources and external lists to try to collect everything, some of which doesn't yet have an article. This section in particular has a number of publications that have no article, and are only referenced on the wiki via external links on the aforementioned list. Once I've got everything rounded up, and the missing articles written, I'll start distributing this navbox. And, yes, I'm aware of the Paths, and they can be included. However, if the individual stories are still online, I'd like to mention them all by name as well. --Corveroth (talk) 05:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Ambitious! Good work. --Hunter (talk) 05:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- The crazy ambitious thing to do would be to try to collect the entirety of the old Duelist articles, but I'll only be touching that in exceptional cases, since so much is prerevisionist. Speaking of which, do you know of any source for the origin of that term, or where that change was declared? --Corveroth (talk) 05:53, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Ambitious! Good work. --Hunter (talk) 05:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Art books
I've got the art books listed in here, and I think that's correct for the modern ones, which incorporate story as well. While Convocations is entirely devoid of story, I think it's reasonable to include it alongside them because I frankly have no idea where it would ever be linked from otherwise. Do we have any sort of navigation for "other" publications? --Corveroth (talk) 03:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)