Talk:Renown: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Parsing discussion.) |
>Corveroth No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I believe this sentence seriously needs to be restructured. I'd do it myself if I could understand what it was supposed to mean. | I believe this sentence seriously needs to be restructured. I'd do it myself if I could understand what it was supposed to mean. | ||
-[Unregistered] 16:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC) | -[Unregistered] 16:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
:Actually, FiXT. [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=74317 Blah]. | |||
:: At first glance, I'd simply revert that, because the original sentence is a direct quote from the rules for Renown (see rule 702.111b just below). However, I agree that it's not the most plain-English phrasing, so let's try something a bit different. --[[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) 17:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:37, 2 September 2015
“Renowned is a designation that has no rules meaning other than to act as a marker that the renown ability and other spells and abilities can identify.”
I believe this sentence seriously needs to be restructured. I'd do it myself if I could understand what it was supposed to mean. -[Unregistered] 16:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, FiXT. Blah.