Talk:Thane Du-Moriss IV: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>LegacymtgsalvationUser8147 No edit summary |
>Hunterofsalvation m (Hunterofsalvation moved page Talk:Du-Moriss IV to Talk:Thane Du-Moriss IV over redirect: Reverting. Thane seems to be part of his name, not a title) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What's the source for this? {{Unsigned|VestDan}} | What's the source for this? {{Unsigned|VestDan}} | ||
:I honestly have no idea. But I remember disscussions with the editor Loot Niptil on Phyrexia.com. He have read (all?) old pre-revisionist books, including anthologies Distant Planes and Tapestries. I suspect it might be from one of those. --<span style="color:#FF0000">[[User:MORT|<sup><sup>M</sup></sup><sup>O</sup>R<sub>T</sub>]]</span> <sup><b>[[User talk: MORT|(T)]]</b></sup> 21:44, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
I honestly have no idea. But I remember disscussions with the editor Loot Niptil on Phyrexia.com. He have read (all?) old pre-revisionist books, including anthologies Distant Planes and Tapestries. I suspect it might be from one of those. --<span style="color:#FF0000">[[User:MORT|<sup><sup>M</sup></sup><sup>O</sup>R<sub>T</sub>]]</span> <sup><b>[[User talk: MORT|(T)]]</b></sup> 21:44, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | ::I'd look into it. Phyrexia.com had some things on it that had NO source, as in somebody on their end made them up, or at the very least mistook something for legit info and posted it there. Phyrexia.com didn't have great editorial oversight, and some of its information was questionable when it came to well-known subjects, such as the Weatherlight saga. Something like this, where there's no other source... I'm very skeptical. {{Unsigned|VestDan}} | ||
:::You mean you had look into it and there was nothing about it? Or you would, if you had them? Yes, Phyrexia.com made some things up, like names on the list of planeswalkers (I never acknowledged how these got there though), but never made up something that major. And Loot seemed to be quite reasonable poster to me... --<span style="color:#FF0000">[[User:MORT|<sup><sup>M</sup></sup><sup>O</sup>R<sub>T</sub>]]</span> <sup><b>[[User talk: MORT|(T)]]</b></sup> 20:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::The source is the Tapestries Anthology, I've added it to the page.--[[User:Firebead elvenhair|Firebead elvenhair]] ([[User talk:Firebead elvenhair|talk]]) 16:50, 26 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:55, 12 May 2018
What's the source for this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by VestDan (talk • contribs).
- I honestly have no idea. But I remember disscussions with the editor Loot Niptil on Phyrexia.com. He have read (all?) old pre-revisionist books, including anthologies Distant Planes and Tapestries. I suspect it might be from one of those. --MORT (T) 21:44, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'd look into it. Phyrexia.com had some things on it that had NO source, as in somebody on their end made them up, or at the very least mistook something for legit info and posted it there. Phyrexia.com didn't have great editorial oversight, and some of its information was questionable when it came to well-known subjects, such as the Weatherlight saga. Something like this, where there's no other source... I'm very skeptical. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by VestDan (talk • contribs).
- You mean you had look into it and there was nothing about it? Or you would, if you had them? Yes, Phyrexia.com made some things up, like names on the list of planeswalkers (I never acknowledged how these got there though), but never made up something that major. And Loot seemed to be quite reasonable poster to me... --MORT (T) 20:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- The source is the Tapestries Anthology, I've added it to the page.--Firebead elvenhair (talk) 16:50, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- You mean you had look into it and there was nothing about it? Or you would, if you had them? Yes, Phyrexia.com made some things up, like names on the list of planeswalkers (I never acknowledged how these got there though), but never made up something that major. And Loot seemed to be quite reasonable poster to me... --MORT (T) 20:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'd look into it. Phyrexia.com had some things on it that had NO source, as in somebody on their end made them up, or at the very least mistook something for legit info and posted it there. Phyrexia.com didn't have great editorial oversight, and some of its information was questionable when it came to well-known subjects, such as the Weatherlight saga. Something like this, where there's no other source... I'm very skeptical. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by VestDan (talk • contribs).