Talk:City of Brass: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>@legacy41915546 No edit summary |
>Corveroth No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This article is about the card '''and''' how it relates to the storyline. Should both aspects be in the same article? Or should there be a '''City of Brass''' article and a '''City of Brass (card)''' article? {{Unsigned|GeoMike| | This article is about the card '''and''' how it relates to the storyline. Should both aspects be in the same article? Or should there be a '''City of Brass''' article and a '''City of Brass (card)''' article? {{Unsigned|GeoMike|24 March 2007}} | ||
Ideally, yes. <sup>M</sup><sub>M</sub> <sup>([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|talk!]])</sup> 09:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | :Ideally, yes. <sup>M</sup><sub>M</sub> <sup>([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|talk!]])</sup> 09:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Image == | |||
Which are the guidelines about card images? On the wiki should be put the image of the first print, or the more recent one? --[[User:Firebead elvenhair|Firebead elvenhair]] ([[User talk:Firebead elvenhair|talk]]) 13:31, 5 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
: There's no such guideline. Card ''links'' will default to the newest version unless you explicitly specify a particular printing (e.g. to point to specific flavor text). Articles preferentially have ''some'' image, but it doesn't need to be card art of any kind. Use the image that best serves to demonstrate or explain the subject. This article already has one printing, so it's probably fine as-is. | |||
: Also, keep in mind copyright: Many images here are owned by Wizards. We can make a fair use argument to defend usage of low-resolution uploads, but maybe not a wallpaper-sized version from the artist's DeviantArt, for example. --[[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) 15:26, 5 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:27, 5 July 2017
This article is about the card and how it relates to the storyline. Should both aspects be in the same article? Or should there be a City of Brass article and a City of Brass (card) article? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GeoMike (talk • contribs) 24 March 2007.
- Ideally, yes. MM (talk!) 09:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Image
Which are the guidelines about card images? On the wiki should be put the image of the first print, or the more recent one? --Firebead elvenhair (talk) 13:31, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- There's no such guideline. Card links will default to the newest version unless you explicitly specify a particular printing (e.g. to point to specific flavor text). Articles preferentially have some image, but it doesn't need to be card art of any kind. Use the image that best serves to demonstrate or explain the subject. This article already has one printing, so it's probably fine as-is.
- Also, keep in mind copyright: Many images here are owned by Wizards. We can make a fair use argument to defend usage of low-resolution uploads, but maybe not a wallpaper-sized version from the artist's DeviantArt, for example. --Corveroth (talk) 15:26, 5 July 2017 (UTC)