User talk:VestDan: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
im>Randel
No edit summary
>@legacy41915546
No edit summary
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
For long names, make the short one as a redirect to the formal one, which is what I have done somewhat :-).
*'''Archives'''
 
**[[User talk:VestDan/Archive1|1]] (2006-20/08/2008)
Make the text of the redirect aticle:
 
<nowiki>#REDIRECT [[the name]]</nowiki>
 
Thanks.[[User:Voice of All(MTG)|Voice of All(MTG)]] 16:37, 13 December 2005 (CST)
 
See, You say that like its obvious or I should know what you are talking about, heh. Besides, a few of the formal names aren't really proper themselves. How does the redirect thing work? [[User:VestDan|VestDan]] 16:40, 13 December 2005 (CST)
:When I said "always", I ment as a rule of thumb, that is how it is done at Wikipedia and Britanicia ect...I should have worded that better, but I was rushing to get the stubs out of the way, plus I have had a 5 hour headache that is getting worse by the minute.
 
:Anyway, are you a sysop yet? I know I haven't been promoted yet. If you are, you will see a "Delete" tab and a "Protect" tab. We might have to wait, as only admins can delete articles.[[User:Voice of All(MTG)|Voice of All(MTG)]] 17:08, 13 December 2005 (CST)
 
So many stubs... make mine eyes bleed... Finished with Weatherlight saga characters, started with Mirari saga and decided to call it a night. [[User:VestDan|VestDan]] 01:51, 14 December 2005 (CST)
 
== Categories ==
 
I noticed that you fixed to incorrect categories. I am cut and pasting these in, and sometimes I leave in a wrong category. Please correct them on  site, you need not explain yourself.
 
I wonder when that Logo will be fixed...:-(.'''[[User:Voice of All(MTG)|<font color="blue">Voice</font><font color="darkblue"> of </font><font color="black">All]]'''</font><sup>[[user_talk:Voice_of_All(MTG)|<font color="blue">Talk</font>]]</sup> 15:22, 14 December 2005 (CST)
:I am saying that you ''don't have'' to explain, not that you do. That is because it is tedious, as you said.'''[[User:Voice of All(MTG)|<font color="blue">Voice</font><font color="darkblue"> of </font><font color="black">All]]'''</font><sup>[[user_talk:Voice_of_All(MTG)|<font color="blue">Talk</font>]]</sup> 15:42, 14 December 2005 (CST)
 
== Template==
Try writing <nowiki>{{c|CARD'S NAME}}</nowiki> for a few cards you know, and then clicking it, like {{c|Lightning Angel}}. I think I like the purple, as opposed to regular blue links. Press cntrol-f5 first, to refresh the mediawiki JS in your browser. Make sure you are not blocking popups.'''[[User:Voice of All(MTG)|<font color="blue">Voice</font><font color="darkblue"> of </font><font color="black">All]]'''</font><sup>[[user_talk:Voice_of_All(MTG)|<font color="blue">Talk</font>]]</sup> 16:43, 9 April 2006 (CDT)
 
Oh, i think i get it now... {{c|Mishra's Factory}}[[User:VestDan|VestDan]] 17:58, 9 April 2006 (CDT)
 
*In response to your question to The Squirle Master, a ret-con is when something considered fact in a work of fiction has been retroactively changed by a later addition to the series. For example, if Batman were to be killed, and there was a big funeral for him, then six months down the line he returns, the events of the night he 'died' will have been ret-conned to show how he didn't really die. [[User:RMS Oceanic|RMS Oceanic]] 11:31, 7 May 2006 (CDT)
::Something that anyone with a passing familiarity with Star Wars fiction knows all too well. Virtually everything ever written about Boba Fett got blasted to crap when Episode II came up, so they had to go back and explain how they weren't completely wrong about everything. :) --[[User:Binary|Binary]] 13:09, 31 May 2006 (CDT)
I already told him that in a PM ages ago, but thanks nonetheless ;)
[[User:The Squirle master|The Squirle master]]
 
== [[MTG_Salvation_Wiki:Articles_For_Deletion|Articles for Deletion]] ==
 
hi, same entries have been there for some time, it should be safe to delete them. --[[User:Oracle of Truth|Oracle of Truth]] 05:29, 18 May 2006 (CDT)
 
I wasn't aware that was actually my job... I'll get on it this evening
 
== Guilds ==
 
I'll be happy to further detail the rest of the Guild pages.  It'll take me some time to do it though.  [[User:Randel|Randel]] 17:45, 22 May 2006 (CDT)
 
*VestDan,
 
Thought you ought to know that I've gotten kind of side tracked.  I'd be happy to conintue the responsibility of detailing the various guild pages, but it will be quite some time before I can get to it or even come back to contributing here at all.  Sorry, [[User:Randel|Randel]] 17:04, 6 July 2006 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 11:03, 20 August 2008

  • Archives
    • 1 (2006-20/08/2008)