Talk:War of the Spark/Card comparisons: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Yandere-sliver (Created page with ""Ugin's Conjurant is strictly better than Endless One" Is that really true? Conjurant seems like an endless one who gets weaker with combat damage it receives. I can imagine s...") |
>Yandere-sliver No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"Ugin's Conjurant is strictly better than Endless One" Is that really true? Conjurant seems like an endless one who gets weaker with combat damage it receives. I can imagine situations where it is indeed better like if it gets transformed somehow. But on its own it dies as soon as the last counter is removed from it.- [[User:Yanderesliver|Yandere Sliver]] [[File:H09 symbol.png|16px|link=User talk:Yanderesliver]] 11:41, 18 April 2019 (UTC) | "Ugin's Conjurant is strictly better than Endless One" Is that really true? Conjurant seems like an endless one who gets weaker with combat damage it receives. I can imagine situations where it is indeed better like if it gets transformed somehow. But on its own it dies as soon as the last counter is removed from it.- [[User:Yanderesliver|Yandere Sliver]] [[File:H09 symbol.png|16px|link=User talk:Yanderesliver]] 11:41, 18 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
:Agreed. I hesitate to say it's strictly ''worse'', but I am struggling to think of situations where I wouldn't prefer Endless One. Ugin's Conjurant's text is almost a trick—it sounds like a good thing because it says damage is prevented, but in effect, it gives anything that damages it [[wither]]. I am afraid people are going to confuse this with the phantom creatures from ''[[Judgment]]'' (e.g., <c>Phantom Flock</c>). --[[User:BlackDiamondDragon|BlackDiamondDragon]] ([[User talk:BlackDiamondDragon|talk]]) 13:49, 18 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
==Spark Double vs Clone== | |||
Why <c>Spark Double</c> isn't a strictly better version of <c>Clone</c>?{{unsigned|178.213.12.233}} | |||
: Clone can target any creatures (also these of your opponents) while Spark Double cannot. That makes the two cards difficult to compare, while Spark Double often is better it is not strictly better. - [[User:Yanderesliver|Yandere Sliver]] [[File:H09 symbol.png|16px|link=User talk:Yanderesliver]] 20:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:05, 16 May 2020
"Ugin's Conjurant is strictly better than Endless One" Is that really true? Conjurant seems like an endless one who gets weaker with combat damage it receives. I can imagine situations where it is indeed better like if it gets transformed somehow. But on its own it dies as soon as the last counter is removed from it.- Yandere Sliver 
11:41, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Agreed. I hesitate to say it's strictly worse, but I am struggling to think of situations where I wouldn't prefer Endless One. Ugin's Conjurant's text is almost a trick—it sounds like a good thing because it says damage is prevented, but in effect, it gives anything that damages it wither. I am afraid people are going to confuse this with the phantom creatures from Judgment (e.g., Phantom Flock). --BlackDiamondDragon (talk) 13:49, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Spark Double vs Clone
Why Spark Double isn't a strictly better version of Clone?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.213.12.233 (talk • contribs).
- Clone can target any creatures (also these of your opponents) while Spark Double cannot. That makes the two cards difficult to compare, while Spark Double often is better it is not strictly better. - Yandere Sliver 20:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)