Talk:Ravnica Allegiance/Card comparisons: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Hanmac (Created page with "is <c>Collision // Colossus</c> stricly better than <c>Colossal Might</c> because it has it as one of its halves?") |
>BlackDiamondDragon (r) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
is <c>Collision // Colossus</c> stricly better than <c>Colossal Might</c> because it has it as one of its halves? | is <c>Collision // Colossus</c> stricly better than <c>Colossal Might</c> because it has it as one of its halves?{{unsigned|Hanmac}} | ||
: I would say yes, by the sole virtue that you can cast Collision instead of Colossus when you need to. The CMC is the only thing that changes and CMC interactions are usually not considered when determine if something would be strictly better. - [[User:Yanderesliver|Yandere Sliver]] [[File:H09 symbol.png|16px|link=User talk:Yanderesliver]] 09:06, 17 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
:Good catch! Added. --[[User:BlackDiamondDragon|BlackDiamondDragon]] ([[User talk:BlackDiamondDragon|talk]]) 14:40, 17 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:40, 17 January 2019
is Collision // Colossus stricly better than Colossal Might because it has it as one of its halves?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hanmac (talk • contribs).
- I would say yes, by the sole virtue that you can cast Collision instead of Colossus when you need to. The CMC is the only thing that changes and CMC interactions are usually not considered when determine if something would be strictly better. - Yandere Sliver
09:06, 17 January 2019 (UTC) - Good catch! Added. --BlackDiamondDragon (talk) 14:40, 17 January 2019 (UTC)