Talk:Hippo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Corveroth No edit summary |
>Hunterofsalvation No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Since it is a completely different subtype (even if it represents an hippo) shouldn't it have a separate page? | Since it is a completely different subtype (even if it represents an hippo) shouldn't it have a separate page? | ||
: On principle, sure. With only two cards and little else to be said, it would be a tiny stub page, and with a redirect in place, I don't see it as a pressing issue. If you feel it improves the wiki, I have no objection to you doing so. I just ask that you weigh the notability of the topics when doing so. Given a set of related topics with little coverage, and the choice between writing ten pages with two sentences or a single page with twenty, the latter option seems superior. It reduces the number of pages needing separate maintenance, and places connected information directly in front of the reader, rather than separating it by further links. --[[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) 04:50, 19 December 2017 (UTC) | : On principle, sure. With only two cards and little else to be said, it would be a tiny stub page, and with a redirect in place, I don't see it as a pressing issue. If you feel it improves the wiki, I have no objection to you doing so. I just ask that you weigh the notability of the topics when doing so. Given a set of related topics with little coverage, and the choice between writing ten pages with two sentences or a single page with twenty, the latter option seems superior. It reduces the number of pages needing separate maintenance, and places connected information directly in front of the reader, rather than separating it by further links. --[[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) 04:50, 19 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
:: Because the Pheldagriffs create Hippo tokens, I think it is justified to leave them on the same page --[[User:Hunterofsalvation|Hunter]] ([[User talk:Hunterofsalvation|talk]]) 06:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:41, 19 December 2017
Pheldaggrif
Since it is a completely different subtype (even if it represents an hippo) shouldn't it have a separate page?
- On principle, sure. With only two cards and little else to be said, it would be a tiny stub page, and with a redirect in place, I don't see it as a pressing issue. If you feel it improves the wiki, I have no objection to you doing so. I just ask that you weigh the notability of the topics when doing so. Given a set of related topics with little coverage, and the choice between writing ten pages with two sentences or a single page with twenty, the latter option seems superior. It reduces the number of pages needing separate maintenance, and places connected information directly in front of the reader, rather than separating it by further links. --Corveroth (talk) 04:50, 19 December 2017 (UTC)