Talk:Chaos Magic: Difference between revisions
>@DeletedUser41917787 (Reference links are broken. 404 @ dest host.) |
>Hunterofsalvation m (Hunterofsalvation moved page Talk:Chaos to Talk:Chaos Magic: Allowing for Chaos Draft) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Chaos is not Chaos Draft== | |||
This needs to be changed. Chaos Draft links to this page, but a real Chaos Draft is something else completely. Chaos Draft is a format that is recognized by Wizards as a draft using different boosters that do not belong to the same set, block, or even format, and has no connection to the actual Chaos Deck, as can be seen on the following link: https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/ways-play/how-chaos-draft-2016-02-25 As such, in order to create an actual Chaos Draft page, we should separate it from the current one. [[Special:Contributions/142.197.126.76|142.197.126.76]] 20:02, 9 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
: I agree. Working on it. --[[User:Hunterofsalvation|Hunter]] ([[User talk:Hunterofsalvation|talk]]) 06:06, 10 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
==Links== | |||
I'm not able to do this change, because of missing wiki knowledge. Where is [DailyRef] defined? Here are some changes necessary. [[User:FluttershyDev|FluttershyDev]] ([[User talk:FluttershyDev|talk]]) 23:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
: Thank you! This is a widespread problem in the wiki. We're still hoping that Wizards will be able to create functioning redirects. How were you able to find the new location of the articles, anyway? And BTW for the references to the new site we use [[Template:NewRef]] --[[User:Hunterofsalvation|Hunter]] ([[User talk:Hunterofsalvation|talk]]) 06:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
:: You're welcome! In fact I just googled the name of the article. But I did some preparative virtual file structure analysis at [http://magic.wizards.com/ http://magic.wizards.com/] - formerly [[magicthegathering.com]] who would redirect to [http://magic.wizards.com/en/magic-gathering http://magic.wizards.com/en/magic-gathering] now - and some html source code analysis as well. No big deal at all. Google this: <pre>"Mixing it up" site:magic.wizards.com</pre> for example. It's commendable that wizards have a suitable and consistent permalink system now. I may recomment the [http://mashable.com/2011/11/24/google-search-infographic/#Nq1vRIiqxsqF Google cheat sheet] which helps to prevent to waste a lot of time by doing online investigation. Regards --[[User:FluttershyDev|FluttershyDev]] ([[User talk:FluttershyDev|talk]]) 03:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
= Link references on [[Chaos]] are outdated = | = Link references on [[Chaos]] are outdated = | ||
Latest revision as of 06:12, 10 November 2019
Chaos is not Chaos Draft
This needs to be changed. Chaos Draft links to this page, but a real Chaos Draft is something else completely. Chaos Draft is a format that is recognized by Wizards as a draft using different boosters that do not belong to the same set, block, or even format, and has no connection to the actual Chaos Deck, as can be seen on the following link: https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/ways-play/how-chaos-draft-2016-02-25 As such, in order to create an actual Chaos Draft page, we should separate it from the current one. 142.197.126.76 20:02, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Links
I'm not able to do this change, because of missing wiki knowledge. Where is [DailyRef] defined? Here are some changes necessary. FluttershyDev (talk) 23:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you! This is a widespread problem in the wiki. We're still hoping that Wizards will be able to create functioning redirects. How were you able to find the new location of the articles, anyway? And BTW for the references to the new site we use Template:NewRef --Hunter (talk) 06:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- You're welcome! In fact I just googled the name of the article. But I did some preparative virtual file structure analysis at http://magic.wizards.com/ - formerly magicthegathering.com who would redirect to http://magic.wizards.com/en/magic-gathering now - and some html source code analysis as well. No big deal at all. Google this:
"Mixing it up" site:magic.wizards.com
for example. It's commendable that wizards have a suitable and consistent permalink system now. I may recomment the Google cheat sheet which helps to prevent to waste a lot of time by doing online investigation. Regards --FluttershyDev (talk) 03:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- You're welcome! In fact I just googled the name of the article. But I did some preparative virtual file structure analysis at http://magic.wizards.com/ - formerly magicthegathering.com who would redirect to http://magic.wizards.com/en/magic-gathering now - and some html source code analysis as well. No big deal at all. Google this:
Link references on Chaos are outdated
Ref 1 external link
http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtgcom/daily/tf64
http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/serious-fun/mixing-it-2007-12-11
Ref 2 external link
http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/tcg/resources/formats-casual
http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/feature/casual-formats-2008-08-11
Ref 2 release date
not dated
2008-08-11
--FluttershyDev (talk) 23:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)