Category talk:Angels: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>@legacy41917001 (agree) |
>@legacy41915546 m (Magic Mage moved page Talk:Angels to Category talk:Angels without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I really have to question the wisdom of having a huge list of angel cards at the tail of this article. I mean, is it really required when one can just do a gatherer search of "angel" and get all those results? Just seems a waste of space.[[User:Barinellos|Barinellos]] 18:58, 19 April 2012 (EDT) | I really have to question the wisdom of having a huge list of angel cards at the tail of this article. I mean, is it really required when one can just do a gatherer search of "angel" and get all those results? Just seems a waste of space.[[User:Barinellos|Barinellos]] 18:58, 19 April 2012 (EDT) | ||
:Agreed. We don't do this on other articles about various creature types. Why do it here? --[[User:SyntheticDreamer|Synthetic]][[User talk:SyntheticDreamer|Dreamer]] 21:59, 19 April 2012 (EDT) | :Agreed. We don't do this on other articles about various creature types. Why do it here? --[[User:SyntheticDreamer|Synthetic]][[User talk:SyntheticDreamer|Dreamer]] 21:59, 19 April 2012 (EDT) | ||
::Doubly - Agreed --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 22:23, 19 April 2012 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:01, 2 November 2012
I really have to question the wisdom of having a huge list of angel cards at the tail of this article. I mean, is it really required when one can just do a gatherer search of "angel" and get all those results? Just seems a waste of space.Barinellos 18:58, 19 April 2012 (EDT)