Category talk:Angels: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
>Barinellos
(Created page with "I really have to question the wisdom of having a huge list of angel cards at the tail of this article. I mean, is it really required when one can just do a gatherer search of "an...")
 
>@legacy41915546
m (Magic Mage moved page Talk:Angels to Category talk:Angels without leaving a redirect)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I really have to question the wisdom of having a huge list of angel cards at the tail of this article. I mean, is it really required when one can just do a gatherer search of "angel" and get all those results? Just seems a waste of space.[[User:Barinellos|Barinellos]] 18:58, 19 April 2012 (EDT)
I really have to question the wisdom of having a huge list of angel cards at the tail of this article. I mean, is it really required when one can just do a gatherer search of "angel" and get all those results? Just seems a waste of space.[[User:Barinellos|Barinellos]] 18:58, 19 April 2012 (EDT)
:Agreed. We don't do this on other articles about various creature types. Why do it here? --[[User:SyntheticDreamer|Synthetic]][[User talk:SyntheticDreamer|Dreamer]] 21:59, 19 April 2012 (EDT)
::Doubly - Agreed --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 22:23, 19 April 2012 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 13:01, 2 November 2012

I really have to question the wisdom of having a huge list of angel cards at the tail of this article. I mean, is it really required when one can just do a gatherer search of "angel" and get all those results? Just seems a waste of space.Barinellos 18:58, 19 April 2012 (EDT)

Agreed. We don't do this on other articles about various creature types. Why do it here? --SyntheticDreamer 21:59, 19 April 2012 (EDT)
Doubly - Agreed --GeoMike 22:23, 19 April 2012 (EDT)