User talk:Xallium: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>@legacy41915546 m (Reply.) |
>@legacy41915546 No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Thanks for your edits, Xallium. They have been, so far, extremely practical and useful to the wiki. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a | Thanks for your edits, Xallium. They have been, so far, extremely practical and useful to the wiki. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a MTGS Wikipedian! :) <font color="darkblue">'''[[User:Magic Mage|MM]]''' '''([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|talk!]])'''</font> 03:19, 11 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Yeh, perhaps the infoboxes for cards should be a bit smaller, thereby making it appear more to the right and more aesthetically pleasing (at least in my opinion). One question, Xallium, are there going to be some discussion on the card, like its impact on the game, or notability? Thanks. <font color="darkblue">'''[[User:Magic Mage|MM]]''' '''([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|talk!]])'''</font> 10:27, 11 April 2007 (CDT) | :Yeh, perhaps the infoboxes for cards should be a bit smaller, thereby making it appear more to the right and more aesthetically pleasing (at least in my opinion). One question, Xallium, are there going to be some discussion on the card, like its impact on the game, or notability? Thanks. <font color="darkblue">'''[[User:Magic Mage|MM]]''' '''([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|talk!]])'''</font> 10:27, 11 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
::Also, Xallium, I've edited in the stuff I've got on the sets/expansion template; it was here. --<font color="darkblue">'''[[User:Magic Mage|MM]]''' '''([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|talk!]])'''</font> 10:31, 11 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
:::NP. And thank ''you''. ;) <font color="darkblue">'''[[User:Magic Mage|MM]]''' '''([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|talk!]])'''</font> 10:37, 11 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:24, 8 October 2008
Thanks for your edits, Xallium. They have been, so far, extremely practical and useful to the wiki. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a MTGS Wikipedian! :) MM (talk!) 03:19, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
- Yeh, perhaps the infoboxes for cards should be a bit smaller, thereby making it appear more to the right and more aesthetically pleasing (at least in my opinion). One question, Xallium, are there going to be some discussion on the card, like its impact on the game, or notability? Thanks. MM (talk!) 10:27, 11 April 2007 (CDT)