Talk:Phelddagrif
Character
To be honest, I wasn't against having a separate article for the original Phelddagrif. It is legendary and therefore appears to represent a specific character. Is there any reason not to have an article for it? RudleyDudley (talk) 21:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- If we're happy to be going with every Legendary creature getting an article, then it's ok for Phelddagrif to have an article. My argument against is that it doesn't have any real lore behind it so fits better as a List of secondary characters entry. But I'll take consistency over that because it's easier for new editors to understand that Legendary = article. -- RivalRowan (talk) 21:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- But I'm not OK with every Legendary creature getting an article. "Phelddagrif (character)" is made up and redundant. This way we get thousands of articles without actual content. --Hunterofsalvation (talk) 05:11, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- A storyline article without a storyline source should be deleted --Hunterofsalvation (talk) 05:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- But I'm not OK with every Legendary creature getting an article. "Phelddagrif (character)" is made up and redundant. This way we get thousands of articles without actual content. --Hunterofsalvation (talk) 05:11, 18 June 2024 (UTC)