Vanilla: Difference between revisions
>@DeletedUser40376198 No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (26 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Vanilla''' is a [[List of Magic slang|slang term]] that refers to [[creature]]s without [[rules text]].<ref name="Few Words">{{DailyRef|making-magic/few-words-rd-2005-01-24|A Few Words From R&D|[[Mark Rosewater]]|January 24, 2005}}</ref><ref>{{DailyRef|latest-developments/ingredients-great-vanillas-2016-11-11|The Ingredients for Great Vanillas|[[Sam Stoddard]]|November 11, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{DailyRef|vanilla-doesnt-do-them-justice-2007-04-30|"Vanilla" Doesn't Do Them Justice|[[Magic Arcana]]|April 30, 2007}}</ref> | |||
==Description== | |||
Many of the iconic cards from ''[[Alpha]]'' were actually vanilla creatures. They appeared in all colors (e.g.<c>Savannah Lions</c>, <c>Merfolk of the Pearl Trident</c>, <c>Scathe Zombies</c>, <c>Hurloon Minotaur</c>, <c>Craw Wurm</c>). Since then, almost every [[expansion]] has featured at least a couple of vanilla creatures. [[Green]] gets the best large vanilla creatures and [[white]] gets the best small vanilla creatures.<ref>{{EzTumblr|https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/679308280676401152|title=What color gets the most efficient vanilla creatures?|March 21, 2022}}</ref> There have been some [[tournament]] level vanilla creatures, like <c>Savannah Lions</c> and <c>Memnite</c>. | |||
However, since 2021 [[R&D]] has reduced their use and they have become [[deciduous]].<ref>{{EzTumblr|https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/656192536907530240|title=I just noticed that AFR doesn't have any vanilla creatures in it, which strikes me as unusual.|July 8, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{EzTumblr|https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/662693978398949376|title=Why have you stopped printing vanilla creatures?|September 18, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{EzTumblr|https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/684169648504242176|title=There hasn’t been a single vanilla creature printed in the past year.|May 13, 2022}}</ref><ref>{{EzTumblr|https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/679265294673461248|title=Since you mentioned that vanilla creatures are printed infrequently now, where does that put them on the Storm Scale?|March 20, 2022}}</ref> <c>Yargle and Multani</c> marked the first Vanilla creature printed since {{Card|Spined Karok}} and {{Card|Ageless Guardian}}, both in [[Strixhaven: School of Mages]], two years prior. | |||
===Variants=== | |||
"'''Vanilla flyer'''" is a creature with nothing but [[flying]] (e.g. <c>Storm Crow</c>).<ref name="Few Words"/> | |||
== | "'''French vanilla'''" refers to creatures that only have [[keyword ability|keyword abilities]] (e.g. <c>Akrasan Squire</c>).<ref>{{EzTumblr|http://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/100443724583/what-does-french-vanilla-mean-in-the-context-of-mtg|title=What does French vanilla mean in the context of MtG?|October 19, 2014}}</ref><ref name="Few Words 2">{{DailyRef|making-magic/few-more-words-rd-2016-11-07|A Few More Words from R&D|[[Mark Rosewater]]|November 7, 2016}}</ref> | ||
"'''Virtual vanilla'''" refers to creatures that are essentially vanilla after the first turn they enter the battlefield (e.g. <c>Augur of Bolas</c>).<ref name="Few Words 2"/> | |||
"'''Virtual french vanilla'''" refers to creatures that are essentially French vanilla after the first turn they enter the battlefield (e.g. <c>Armada Wurm</c>).<ref>{{EzTumblr|http://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/66530551834/wait-i-thought-vanilla-was-no-rules-text-virtual|title=Wait, I thought Vanilla was (...)|November 09, 2013}}</ref> | |||
===Vanilla Test=== | |||
A basic heuristic that judges the playability of a creature by consider the total stats in comparison to its cost. The test is more relevant in Limited than in Constructed, as rarely are vanilla creatures above the cost of two ever playable regardless of size, while occasional vanilla five or six mana creatures are playable in Limited. It is also a measure of power level over time, as the math below has been calibrated for the last five years and creatures prior were usually worse: common 3 mana 3/2s were once not printed without a downside mechanic, whereas now all colors can get them, with upside. | |||
The Limited math typically follows that a creature needs double the stats of the mana value (i.e. 1/3 or 2/2 for 2, 3/3 or 2/4 for 3), but the scaling become less linear at higher costs. Only green can get a common 4-mana 4/4, with red getting them with downsides, which means that 4-drops are measured against seven points and 5-drops against nine points. Toughness comes at a lower premium after a certain number, as a 1/7 does not compare to a 7/1, but both are generally worse than a 4/3.<ref>{{WebRef|url=https://strategy.channelfireball.com/all-strategy/home/the-empirical-vanilla-test-in-mtg/|title=The Empirical Vanilla Test in MTG|author=Magic Data Science|date=August 25th, 2022}}</ref> Furthermore, double-colored costs are often problematic enough to be counted an extra partial mana tax. | |||
Going beyond "vanilla", good evergreen abilities can usually be rated at one mana each, though power scaling makes these evaluations less linear. As Limited is the main driver for these tests, "French Vanilla" creatures are often added. Evaluating new and contextual abilities shapes the learning curve of Limited. | |||
In Constructed, a 3-mana 4/3 is already considered inconsequential, and {{Card|Woolly Thoctar}} is close to the lower edge of acceptability; even {{Card|Baneslayer Angel}}, a card that passes vanilla and has about four mana in abilities, was relegated to "powerful sideboard option". This is due to removal choices being capped at three mana or less to be considered good, and so any creature lacking in protection or entry value suffers at mana over three. | |||
==="Vanilla matters"=== | |||
For a long time, <c>Muraganda Petroglyphs</c> was the only card that rewarded vanilla creatures for having no abilities. The Petroglyphs inspired many fans to ask for a set with a "vanilla matters" themes. [[Mark Rosewater]] has extensively explained why such a theme is not feasible and won't make good game play.<ref>{{EzTumblr|https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/160083633698|title=In regards to Muraganda and a vanilla creature theme|April 28, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{EzTumblr|https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/161902956408|title="Drive to Work #444 - Vanilla Matters"|June 16, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{EzTumblr|https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/671473521891983360|title="Vanilla Matters" is not a theme that's deep enough to support a set. Is it even deep enough to support a 2-color draft strategy?|December 24, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{EzTumblr|https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/682649979174649856|title=Could a hypothetical Muraganda set have Vanilla Matters as one of the ten draft archetypes?|April 26, 2022}}</ref> | |||
''[[Commander 2021]]'' added <c>Ruxa, Patient Professor</c>, while <c>Jasmine Boreal of the Seven</c> was released in the [[Legends Retold]] of ''[[Dominaria United]]''. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Latest revision as of 08:33, 20 June 2023
Vanilla is a slang term that refers to creatures without rules text.[1][2][3]
Description
Many of the iconic cards from Alpha were actually vanilla creatures. They appeared in all colors (e.g.Savannah Lions, Merfolk of the Pearl Trident, Scathe Zombies, Hurloon Minotaur, Craw Wurm). Since then, almost every expansion has featured at least a couple of vanilla creatures. Green gets the best large vanilla creatures and white gets the best small vanilla creatures.[4] There have been some tournament level vanilla creatures, like Savannah Lions and Memnite.
However, since 2021 R&D has reduced their use and they have become deciduous.[5][6][7][8] Yargle and Multani marked the first Vanilla creature printed since Spined Karok and Ageless Guardian, both in Strixhaven: School of Mages, two years prior.
Variants
"Vanilla flyer" is a creature with nothing but flying (e.g. Storm Crow).[1]
"French vanilla" refers to creatures that only have keyword abilities (e.g. Akrasan Squire).[9][10]
"Virtual vanilla" refers to creatures that are essentially vanilla after the first turn they enter the battlefield (e.g. Augur of Bolas).[10]
"Virtual french vanilla" refers to creatures that are essentially French vanilla after the first turn they enter the battlefield (e.g. Armada Wurm).[11]
Vanilla Test
A basic heuristic that judges the playability of a creature by consider the total stats in comparison to its cost. The test is more relevant in Limited than in Constructed, as rarely are vanilla creatures above the cost of two ever playable regardless of size, while occasional vanilla five or six mana creatures are playable in Limited. It is also a measure of power level over time, as the math below has been calibrated for the last five years and creatures prior were usually worse: common 3 mana 3/2s were once not printed without a downside mechanic, whereas now all colors can get them, with upside.
The Limited math typically follows that a creature needs double the stats of the mana value (i.e. 1/3 or 2/2 for 2, 3/3 or 2/4 for 3), but the scaling become less linear at higher costs. Only green can get a common 4-mana 4/4, with red getting them with downsides, which means that 4-drops are measured against seven points and 5-drops against nine points. Toughness comes at a lower premium after a certain number, as a 1/7 does not compare to a 7/1, but both are generally worse than a 4/3.[12] Furthermore, double-colored costs are often problematic enough to be counted an extra partial mana tax.
Going beyond "vanilla", good evergreen abilities can usually be rated at one mana each, though power scaling makes these evaluations less linear. As Limited is the main driver for these tests, "French Vanilla" creatures are often added. Evaluating new and contextual abilities shapes the learning curve of Limited.
In Constructed, a 3-mana 4/3 is already considered inconsequential, and Woolly Thoctar is close to the lower edge of acceptability; even Baneslayer Angel, a card that passes vanilla and has about four mana in abilities, was relegated to "powerful sideboard option". This is due to removal choices being capped at three mana or less to be considered good, and so any creature lacking in protection or entry value suffers at mana over three.
"Vanilla matters"
For a long time, Muraganda Petroglyphs was the only card that rewarded vanilla creatures for having no abilities. The Petroglyphs inspired many fans to ask for a set with a "vanilla matters" themes. Mark Rosewater has extensively explained why such a theme is not feasible and won't make good game play.[13][14][15][16]
Commander 2021 added Ruxa, Patient Professor, while Jasmine Boreal of the Seven was released in the Legends Retold of Dominaria United.
References
- ↑ a b Mark Rosewater (January 24, 2005). "A Few Words From R&D". magicthegathering.com. Wizards of the Coast.
- ↑ Sam Stoddard (November 11, 2016). "The Ingredients for Great Vanillas". magicthegathering.com. Wizards of the Coast.
- ↑ Magic Arcana (April 30, 2007). ""Vanilla" Doesn't Do Them Justice". magicthegathering.com. Wizards of the Coast.
- ↑ Mark Rosewater (March 21, 2022). "What color gets the most efficient vanilla creatures?". Blogatog. Tumblr.
- ↑ Mark Rosewater (July 8, 2021). "I just noticed that AFR doesn't have any vanilla creatures in it, which strikes me as unusual.". Blogatog. Tumblr.
- ↑ Mark Rosewater (September 18, 2021). "Why have you stopped printing vanilla creatures?". Blogatog. Tumblr.
- ↑ Mark Rosewater (May 13, 2022). "There hasn’t been a single vanilla creature printed in the past year.". Blogatog. Tumblr.
- ↑ Mark Rosewater (March 20, 2022). "Since you mentioned that vanilla creatures are printed infrequently now, where does that put them on the Storm Scale?". Blogatog. Tumblr.
- ↑ Mark Rosewater (October 19, 2014). "What does French vanilla mean in the context of MtG?". Blogatog. Tumblr.
- ↑ a b Mark Rosewater (November 7, 2016). "A Few More Words from R&D". magicthegathering.com. Wizards of the Coast.
- ↑ Mark Rosewater (November 09, 2013). "Wait, I thought Vanilla was (...)". Blogatog. Tumblr.
- ↑ Magic Data Science (August 25th, 2022). "The Empirical Vanilla Test in MTG"
- ↑ Mark Rosewater (April 28, 2017). "In regards to Muraganda and a vanilla creature theme". Blogatog. Tumblr.
- ↑ Mark Rosewater (June 16, 2017). ""Drive to Work #444 - Vanilla Matters"". Blogatog. Tumblr.
- ↑ Mark Rosewater (December 24, 2021). ""Vanilla Matters" is not a theme that's deep enough to support a set. Is it even deep enough to support a 2-color draft strategy?". Blogatog. Tumblr.
- ↑ Mark Rosewater (April 26, 2022). "Could a hypothetical Muraganda set have Vanilla Matters as one of the ten draft archetypes?". Blogatog. Tumblr.