Commander (format): Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

11 July 2023

7 July 2023

  • curprev 17:4017:40, 7 July 2023>Jerodastm 15,908 bytes +61 fixed webref from original edit. maybe the mobile visual editor is not the best way to add stuff... I don't see an author listed so removed that. not sure if this is a good link it looks kind of like an SEO-driven content generator...

30 June 2023

27 June 2023

20 May 2023

  • curprev 02:3502:35, 20 May 202368.134.93.165 talk 15,734 bytes +10 Changed "Planeswalker with the ability to be commander" to "non-creature permanent with the ability to be commander", so that the resulting text is inclusive of Shorikai, Genesis Engine

9 February 2023

30 January 2023

18 July 2022

  • curprev 04:0204:02, 18 July 2022>Jerodast 15,611 bytes +423 Surprised this wasn't clearer here or on Commander website; not having played much Commander it actually took some work for me to double check this was true and it wasn't using the Modern card list or something.
  • curprev 03:3903:39, 18 July 2022>Jerodast 15,188 bytes +255 Accidentally hit submit hotkey too soon on previous edit; made the changes to the original cEDH text so this is more about the overall philosophy including both traditional and competitive commander. removed the subjective, unsourced stuff about "people getting into it" and "much debate if it's a format".
  • curprev 03:2703:27, 18 July 2022>Jerodast 14,933 bytes +180 Making a bold and possibly aggressive call: cEDH is not a separate format. Puh-lease. It's simply a way of playing the same format in a different social context. However, the concept does speak to commander philosophies in a way not previously addressed here. Also, made "Events and venues" section since those 4 subsections really didn't seem to deserve their own top-level section. (Possibly we could even just remove the subsection headers and leave the content as plain paragraphs.)

5 June 2022

17 March 2022

13 September 2021

8 August 2021

13 July 2021

12 July 2021

10 July 2021

9 July 2021

28 June 2021

24 April 2021

19 April 2021

20 February 2021

22 January 2021

5 January 2021

3 January 2021

28 October 2020

27 October 2020

26 October 2020

3 September 2020

2 August 2020

12 July 2020

11 July 2020

15 June 2020

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)